SAS AML Developer
Most RequestedConfigures and extends detection on the AML solution, comfortable in both the solution layer and the code beneath it.
- Scenario config
- Base SAS
- Macro
- SQL
Hire AML detection, tuning, case management, data and platform specialists across SAS financial crime estates. The scarce combination here is a genuine SAS programming background alongside financial crime domain judgement — and that is exactly what we screen for.
For banks, payments firms and SAS delivery partners. Contract, contract-to-hire and dedicated pods.
SAS estates reward engineers who are genuinely comfortable in code — Base SAS, macro, heavy SQL and data integration work sit under the solution layer. Financial crime hiring, meanwhile, prizes typology and tuning judgement. Candidates usually arrive strong in one and thin in the other, and briefs rarely say which one they actually need.
So we ask first and screen accordingly. If the work is scenario and tuning, we prioritise domain judgement and defensibility. If it is data, integration or platform, we prioritise engineering depth. Where you genuinely need both in one person, we say what that costs and how long it takes to find, rather than sending compromises and hoping.
All ExpertiseMix and match into a squad, or add one specialist to a team you already have.
Configures and extends detection on the AML solution, comfortable in both the solution layer and the code beneath it.
Designs and amends detection for new products, markets and typologies, then proves behaviour.
Above and below-the-line testing, segmentation review and the evidence pack behind each change.
Case types, workflow, queues, forms and investigator experience on the SAS case tooling.
Source feeds, mappings, reference data and the reconciliation that proves nothing was dropped.
Real-time payment fraud detection, decisioning performance and channel coverage on SAS fraud tooling.
Environments, job scheduling, deployment, performance and migration between platform generations.
Independent challenge of detection and tuning, regression across change, and pre-audit evidence.
Requirements get mapped against this grid before we send anyone, so you can see depth by area instead of reading it out of a CV.
Platform-agnostic briefs are staffed from the discipline practices — see AML, transaction monitoring and fraud talent.
Named specialists for a defined period — a tuning cycle, a migration wave, administration cover.
DetailsWork together first, convert to permanent once the fit with your compliance team is proven.
DetailsA standing pod that owns detection change, tuning cycles and the platform underneath.
DetailsA scoped outcome — a Viya migration, a model overhaul, a regulator-driven remediation.
DetailsFour steps, and you hear from us at each one.
Which solutions, SAS 9 or Viya, whether the role is domain-led or engineering-led, and who signs off model change.
A reviewer with financial crime background probes both sides: detection owned, and how comfortable the candidate really is in code.
Profiles arrive with SAS engineering depth and financial crime judgement rated separately, plus notice period and rate.
We coordinate panels, handle paperwork and stay involved through the first weeks on your estate.
Representative profile structures for the three most common briefs.
Detection and code · multi-solution
Model governance facing · statistical background
SAS 9 toward Viya · administration-led
These are representative profile structures, not live availability. Current availability, notice periods and rates are shared against a specific requirement.
It depends on the role, and it is the first thing we establish. Scenario and tuning work leans on domain judgement; data, feed and platform work leans on engineering. We rate the two separately on the shortlist rather than averaging them into a single impression.
For data and platform roles, often yes. For detection and tuning roles the domain gap is real, and we would tell you what the ramp-up looks like rather than presenting it as a straight fit.
It does, particularly for platform and administration roles where tooling and deployment differ between generations. We check which estate the experience came from and flag it on the shortlist.
Yes — see NICE Actimize talent for vendor-specific briefs, or the discipline pages if you are platform-agnostic: AML, KYC, transaction monitoring and fraud.
Yes, and it is worth briefing separately. Administration is routinely absorbed by developers who then have less time for detection work, which slows both.
A JD if you have one. If not: which solutions, SAS 9 or Viya, whether the role is domain or engineering-led, seniority, engagement type and location expectations.
Send a JD or a two-line outline. We come back with the roles that fit, what the market looks like for them, and a shortlist against your requirement.
Two minutes now, a shortlist conversation next.