Actimize Platform Engineer
Most RequestedOwns the AIS layer — components, services, environments, jobs and the plumbing detection depends on.
- Platform config
- Services & jobs
- Environments
Hire engineers who work below the detection layer — the Actimize platform itself, risk case management, and the designer tooling that shapes how investigators see a case. This is where undocumented customisation accumulates, and where the people who understand it are hardest to find.
For banks, payments firms and Actimize delivery partners. Contract, contract-to-hire and dedicated pods.
Platform and case management work tends to be done once, by a small team, years ago, and then left alone. The configuration outlives the people who built it. When something has to change — an upgrade, a new queue structure, a migration — the institutional memory has usually left the building.
The engineers who can pick that up are not the same as detection specialists. They read existing configuration before touching it, work comfortably in SQL and the data model, and are unfazed by customisation that has no design document. We screen specifically for that: what did you inherit, how did you work out what it did, and what did you change without breaking the investigators’ day?
All NICE Actimize TalentMix and match into a squad, or add one specialist to a team you already have.
Owns the AIS layer — components, services, environments, jobs and the plumbing detection depends on.
Case types, workflow states, queues, alert routing and the day-to-day behaviour of the investigation tool.
Builds forms, layouts and screen behaviour in the designer tooling, and keeps it coherent as requirements accumulate.
User roles, entitlements, segregation of duties and the audit trail that internal audit will eventually test.
Feeds in, case data out — source systems, reporting extracts, downstream workflow and third-party tools.
Version upgrades on the platform, and the mapping work behind a move from RCM to ActOne.
Works with investigators and their managers to turn how the operation runs into buildable configuration.
Regression across case types, permissions and workflow paths — the areas an upgrade quietly breaks.
Requirements get mapped against this grid before we send anyone, so you can see depth by area instead of reading it out of a CV.
Named specialists for a defined period — an upgrade, a queue restructure, cover for a departure.
DetailsWork together first, convert to permanent once the fit is proven on your configuration.
DetailsA standing pod that holds the platform knowledge instead of letting it walk out again.
DetailsA scoped outcome — a platform upgrade, a case management rebuild, a migration wave.
DetailsFour steps, and you hear from us at each one.
Which platform version, how customised, who uses the case tool, and whether a move to ActOne is on the roadmap.
A financial-crime-experienced reviewer probes inherited work: what was undocumented, how it was decoded, what changed safely.
Profiles arrive with a written view on platform, case management and designer depth separately.
We coordinate panels, handle paperwork and stay involved through the first weeks on your estate.
Representative profile structures for the three most common briefs.
Multi-solution estate · on-premise or hosted
Investigation operations facing
RCM toward ActOne · carrier or partner side
These are representative profile structures, not live availability. Current availability, notice periods and rates are shared against a specific requirement.
It is, but the pool is narrowing rather than growing, and we will say so on the intake call. In practice the strongest candidates now have both — existing platform and case management depth plus exposure to a migration — and they are in demand from the firms running those migrations.
Usually both, doing different work. Detection change sits with AML or fraud specialists; the platform, case tool and designer layer sits here. On the intake call we help split the brief so you are not paying one person to cover two jobs badly.
Yes, for the transition. Someone has to understand what the current configuration does before it can be mapped, and that knowledge is what makes a migration cost predictable. See ActOne / Case Management for the target-state roles.
It can, and it is a specific screening question for us rather than an afterthought. We look for engineers who have inherited undocumented estates before and can describe how they worked out what the configuration did.
Yes. If the scope grows, the same engagement can extend into a dedicated team without re-contracting from scratch.
A JD if you have one. If not: platform version, how customised the estate is, which layer the work sits in, whether a migration is planned, seniority, engagement type and location expectations.
Send a JD or a two-line outline. We come back with the roles that fit, what the market looks like for them, and a shortlist against your requirement.
Two minutes now, a shortlist conversation next.