Policy Configuration Developer
Most RequestedAuthors product, screens and policy transaction behaviour, working with the inheritance model rather than against it.
- Author
- Manuscripts
- Extensions
- Policy lifecycle
Hire policy, rating, billing, claims and integration specialists for the Duck Creek suite. The engineers worth hiring know why an override that works today makes the next upgrade expensive — and configure accordingly.
For insurers, MGAs and Duck Creek delivery partners. Contract, contract-to-hire and dedicated pods.
Configuration is authored rather than coded in the usual sense, sits on a .NET and SQL Server foundation, and depends on an inheritance model that rewards extending and punishes overriding. None of that maps neatly onto a Guidewire or in-house background, which is why cross-platform substitutions rarely work as well as a brief assumes.
So we screen on the model, not the logo. Where did you extend versus override, and why? What did the last upgrade cost you in remediation, and which decisions caused it? How was the product structured for a new line of business? On OnDemand, what could you not do that you would have done on-premise? Engineers who have lived it answer immediately.
All ExpertiseMix and match into a squad, or add one specialist to a team you already have.
Authors product, screens and policy transaction behaviour, working with the inheritance model rather than against it.
Owns rating logic, tables and rate revision cycles, including the testing that proves premium is right.
Billing and payment plans, invoicing, delinquency behaviour and the finance handoff.
Claim intake, lifecycle, reserves and payments, plus the workflow the adjusters actually use.
APIs, managed integrations, document and payment systems, bureau data and downstream reporting.
Producer onboarding, licensing, hierarchy and compensation configuration.
Sets configuration standards, reviews extension design and keeps the build upgrade-safe.
Version upgrades and hosted migration — impact analysis, remediation and regression.
Requirements get mapped against this grid before we send anyone, so you can see depth by area instead of reading it out of a CV.
Named specialists for a defined period — a release, a rate revision, an upgrade wave.
DetailsWork together first, convert to permanent once the fit on your configuration is proven.
DetailsA standing pod — developers, BA, QA, lead — that stays with your product roadmap.
DetailsA scoped outcome — a new line of business, an upgrade, an integration workstream.
DetailsFour steps, and you hear from us at each one.
Which suite components, version, OnDemand or on-premise, product lines in scope, and what the team already covers.
A reviewer with core insurance background probes configuration decisions: extension design, rating owned, upgrade remediation.
Profiles arrive with a written view on depth by component, notice period, rate and known gaps.
We coordinate panels, handle paperwork and stay involved through the first weeks on your codebase.
Representative profile structures for the three most common briefs.
Personal or commercial lines · OnDemand and on-premise
New lines of business and rate revisions
Microsoft stack · multi-system estate
These are representative profile structures, not live availability. Current availability, notice periods and rates are shared against a specific requirement.
Sometimes, for the insurance domain knowledge, but not as a like-for-like substitution. The configuration model, tooling and technology stack are different enough that the ramp-up is real. If you are open to a cross-platform hire we will say what that ramp-up costs rather than presenting it as an even swap.
It is smaller than the Guidewire pool in most markets, and we would rather say so on the intake call than after three weeks. Where dedicated depth is genuinely scarce, we will tell you what a realistic near match looks like and what it would need to succeed.
It does. Hosted estates constrain what can be changed and how releases work, so engineers used to unrestricted on-premise configuration need evidence of working within those limits. We flag it on the shortlist rather than letting it surface in interview.
Yes, and most briefs need it. We screen for depth per component rather than treating suite experience as one undifferentiated skill.
Yes. If the scope grows, the same engagement can extend into a dedicated team without re-contracting from scratch.
A JD if you have one. If not: suite components, version, OnDemand or on-premise, product lines in scope, seniority, engagement type and location expectations.
Send a JD or a two-line outline. We come back with the roles that fit, what the market looks like for them, and a shortlist against your requirement.
Two minutes now, a shortlist conversation next.