AML Technology Consultant
Most RequestedOwns detection design and configuration across whichever monitoring platform you run.
- Detection design
- Configuration
- Governance
Hire anti-money-laundering technologists across whichever platforms sit in your estate — monitoring, customer due diligence, screening, tuning and the data underneath all three. Platform-agnostic briefs welcome; we will tell you honestly which vendor experience transfers to yours and which does not.
For banks, payments firms, fintechs and consultancies. Contract, contract-to-hire and dedicated pods.
Typology understanding, tuning method, segmentation logic and the ability to defend a decision to compliance travel with the person. Configuration syntax, platform quirks and deployment mechanics do not. Most hiring goes wrong because the brief treats those two halves as one thing.
So we split them. If your requirement is genuinely platform-critical — a live upgrade, a tight deadline, an estate nobody documented — we hold the line on vendor experience. If the value is in judgement, we open the search wider and tell you what the ramp-up looks like on your stack. Either way you see the reasoning, not just the CV.
All Financial Crime Technology TalentMix and match into a squad, or add one specialist to a team you already have.
Owns detection design and configuration across whichever monitoring platform you run.
Builds and amends monitoring logic for new products, markets and typologies, then proves it behaves.
Threshold analysis, segmentation review and the documentation model governance expects to see.
Customer risk rating models, review triggers and the scoring logic behind onboarding decisions.
Sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening, match logic, list management and rescreening cycles.
Feeds, mappings, reference data, completeness controls and the lineage an auditor will ask about.
Suspicious activity and threshold reporting output, plus the controls that prove it was complete.
Independent testing of detection outcomes, regression across change, and pre-audit evidence.
Requirements get mapped against this grid before we send anyone, so you can see depth by area instead of reading it out of a CV.
Vendor-specific briefs are staffed from the platform practices — see NICE Actimize AML and SAS financial crime talent.
Named specialists for a defined period — a tuning cycle, a remediation, an audit response.
DetailsWork together first, convert to permanent once the fit with your compliance team is proven.
DetailsA standing pod that owns detection change, tuning cycles and the data underneath.
DetailsA scoped outcome — a platform replacement, a model overhaul, a regulator-driven remediation.
DetailsFour steps, and you hear from us at each one.
Which platforms, whether vendor experience is genuinely essential, the products and markets in scope, and who signs off model change.
A financial-crime-experienced reviewer probes real decisions: detection owned, tuning defended, data issues found.
Profiles arrive with platform depth and compliance literacy rated separately, plus notice period and rate.
We coordinate panels, handle paperwork and stay involved through the first weeks on your estate.
Representative profile structures for the three most common briefs.
Multi-platform background · retail and commercial
Model governance facing · statistical background
Upstream of detection · audit-facing
These are representative profile structures, not live availability. Current availability, notice periods and rates are shared against a specific requirement.
If the work is platform-critical, yes — see NICE Actimize or SAS talent. If the value is in typology and tuning judgement, briefing the discipline opens a wider pool, and we will tell you what ramp-up on your stack realistically costs.
By asking what the person owned rather than which logo they sat under. Someone who designed segmentation and defended thresholds carries that anywhere; someone who configured to a spec written by a consultancy usually does not.
Yes — see transaction monitoring, KYC, fraud and risk & compliance technology.
Yes, and it is worth briefing explicitly. A significant share of detection problems are data problems, and the engineers who can work both layers are the ones who shorten these programmes.
Yes. If the scope grows, the same engagement can extend into a dedicated team without re-contracting from scratch.
A JD if you have one. If not: which platforms, whether vendor experience is essential, products and markets in scope, whether the role is detection, tuning or data-led, seniority, engagement type and location expectations.
Send a JD or a two-line outline. We come back with the roles that fit, what the market looks like for them, and a shortlist against your requirement.
Two minutes now, a shortlist conversation next.