ActOne Configuration Developer
Most RequestedCase types, entity views, fields and behaviour across AML and fraud lines of investigation.
- Case types
- Entity views
- Configuration
Hire configuration, workflow and migration specialists for ActOne case management — entity-centric investigation, queues and SLAs, narratives and reporting, and the mapping work behind a move off legacy case management. The scarce skill here is real migration experience.
For banks, payments firms and Actimize delivery partners. Contract, contract-to-hire and dedicated pods.
Detection specialists are plentiful by comparison. People who have configured ActOne on a live programme — and better still, migrated a bank onto it from legacy case management — are not, because there have simply been fewer of those programmes to work on.
Which means the screening question is not “do you know the product” but “what have you actually delivered on it”. How many case types did you configure, and for which line of investigation? What did you have to change about the workflow after investigators used it? On a migration, how were historic cases mapped and reconciled, and what was deliberately left behind?
All NICE Actimize TalentMix and match into a squad, or add one specialist to a team you already have.
Case types, entity views, fields and behaviour across AML and fraud lines of investigation.
Workflow states, routing, queues, SLAs and escalation — the mechanics of how work reaches the right person.
Investigation forms, field logic, disposition capture and the narrative output regulators eventually read.
Maps case types, historic cases and retention rules from legacy case management, with reconciliation that stands up.
Alert intake from detection, customer and transaction context, document handling and downstream reporting.
Operational dashboards, SLA reporting and the regulatory numbers compliance has to produce on demand.
Sits with investigation teams, maps how they actually work, and protects throughput through the change.
Workflow and permission regression, plus reconciliation testing across a migration cutover.
Requirements get mapped against this grid before we send anyone, so you can see depth by area instead of reading it out of a CV.
Named specialists for a defined period — a workflow rebuild, a reporting gap, migration support.
DetailsWork together first, convert to permanent once the fit is proven with your investigation teams.
DetailsA standing pod, because case management change follows every detection and policy change.
DetailsA scoped outcome — a migration off legacy case management, or consolidating AML and fraud investigation.
DetailsFour steps, and you hear from us at each one.
Greenfield or migration, which lines of investigation, how many users, and what the reporting obligation looks like.
A financial-crime-experienced reviewer probes delivered work: case types configured, workflow changed after user feedback, migrations run.
Profiles arrive with a written view on configuration, migration and reporting depth separately.
We coordinate panels, handle paperwork and stay involved through the first weeks on your estate.
Representative profile structures for the three most common briefs.
AML and fraud investigation · live programme
Legacy case management to ActOne
Operations facing · MI-heavy
These are representative profile structures, not live availability. Current availability, notice periods and rates are shared against a specific requirement.
Less than the market implies, because there have been fewer programmes than there are people claiming the skill. We screen on what was delivered rather than on product familiarity, and on the intake call we will tell you honestly what is available in your window.
Usually a migration engineer alongside someone who understands the outgoing configuration — see AIS / RCM / RCMD. Mapping is the bulk of the work, and it needs knowledge of both ends.
Yes, and we recommend it. A business analyst who sits with investigation teams protects throughput through the change, which is where case management programmes usually take criticism.
Yes. See Actimize AML, IFM / Fraud and Implementation & Upgrade.
Yes. If the scope grows, the same engagement can extend into a dedicated team without re-contracting from scratch.
A JD if you have one. If not: greenfield or migration, which lines of investigation, approximate user numbers, reporting obligations, seniority, engagement type and location expectations.
Send a JD or a two-line outline. We come back with the roles that fit, what the market looks like for them, and a shortlist against your requirement.
Two minutes now, a shortlist conversation next.